Welcome to GGWAdvice

Related questions

0 votes
0 answers
0 votes
0 answers
0 votes
0 answers
asked Jun 7 in bodily health by xiaolan (2,640 points)  
0 votes
0 answers
Welcome to GGWAdvice, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community. Don't forget out main site Gay Guide World, the leading interactive international directory of all things gay. Also our great LGTBI network, free without ads, GGW Network

Share this question

Federal Court Upholds Ban on Contractor Campaign Donations

0 votes

This week, a federal judge in Washington, citing the government interest in preventing corruption, refused to block enforcement of a law that bans federal contractors from donating to political candidates and parties. Three federal contractors, Wendy Wagner, Lawrence Brown, and Jan Miller, sued the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in October of last year claiming the Federal Election Campaign Act's ban on contractor political contributions violates the First (free speech and association) and Fifth (Equal Protection) amendments. They sought an injunction to stop enforcement of the ban. District Judge James Boasberg denied the injunction. "The ban on such contributions guards against arrangements Cheap Cigarettes For Sale Online, in which people seeking federal contracts provide financial support to political candidates in return for their help securing government business Duty Free Marlboro Cigarettes," Boasberg wrote in his opinion. "It also protects such contractors from pressure to contribute or risk losing their work." As Boasberg noted, the restriction on federal contractor political contributions goes back more than 70 years, when Congress passed the Hatch Act to prevent corruption and "protect the integrity of the electoral system by ensuring that federal contracts be awarded based on merits." To the plaintiffs' argument that there's no current evidence that federal contractors are corrupting the electoral process Newport Cigarettes For Sale, Boasberg had a pithy response: "An absence of corruption does not necessarily mean…that the ban is no longer needed. It could simply be an indication that the ban is working." Contractors can still avail themselves of other means of political expression. They can still speak or write about their views on candidates and political issues, volunteer for campaigns, and offer the use of their homes for candidate- or political party-related activities. Of course, if the contractor is a corporation (even a single-person corporation), the corporation itself is also subject to the ban Cheapest Marlboro Cigarettes, but officers, directors, stockholders and employees of the corporation, and political action committees (PACs) set up by the corporation, are free to contribute to federal elections. You might remember last year's dust-up over the Obama administration's proposed executive order requiring contractor companies to disclose their political contributions Cigarettes Online Free Shipping. We discovered that the top 20 contractors had spent a combined total of $46 million in campaign contributions and secured $559 billion in contracts between fiscal years 1997 and 2004. If you include the $390 million they spent on lobbying during that period, you still end up with a whopping 1,281 percent return on investment. Looking at it another way, the top 20 contractors spent approximately 8 cents for every $100 they received in contracts. In that report, POGO recommended restoring the pre-1976 ban on contractor campaign contributions. POGO supports restrictions on and greater transparency in contractor political spending. "Pay-to-play" threatens the integrity and efficiency of the federal contracting system.
related article :
Printable Coupons For Cigarettes
Marlboro Light Pack
Flavored Cigarettes Online
Marlboro Menthols Price
Herbal Cigarettes Ireland

asked Jun 14 in mental health by cigspriced (840 points)  
    

Please log in or register to answer this question.

...